Your basket is currently empty!
Tag: Copyright
Did Kim Kardashian Lie About Her Furniture? The Truth About the $90,000 Lawsuit!
Kim Kardashian, the famous reality TV star and businesswoman, is in a bit of a pickle. She recently showed off her super stylish office in a video, but now she’s being sued over some of the furniture! Here’s the lowdown:
Fancy Tables, Fancy Trouble:
In the video, Kim pointed out some sleek tables and chairs, saying they were designed by a famous artist named Donald Judd. These aren’t your average dinner table and chairs – apparently, real Donald Judd furniture is super expensive! We’re talking tables that cost around $90,000 each, with only three being sold in the past 15 years. The chairs are no slouches either, costing a cool $9,000 each.
Hold on, Not So Fast!
Here’s where things get tricky. The company that protects Donald Judd’s legacy, called the Judd Foundation, doesn’t think Kim’s furniture is the real deal. They say the tables and chairs are just copies, not actually designed by Donald Judd himself. Because Kim said they were real in her video, the Judd Foundation is suing her!
Why Sue Over Furniture?
There are a couple of reasons why the Judd Foundation might be upset. First, they want to make sure people know what’s real and what’s not. When someone as famous as Kim Kardashian says something is authentic Donald Judd, it can mislead people. Second, the Judd Foundation actually makes money by selling real Donald Judd furniture. If a bunch of fake stuff is floating around, it might hurt their business.
What Happens Now?
We don’t know exactly how this will play out. Kim Kardashian might have to prove her furniture is real, or maybe she didn’t know it was fake in the first place. The court will decide who’s right and who’s wrong.
What Does This Mean for You?
This situation might not directly affect your life, but it’s a good reminder to be careful about what you see online, even from celebrities. It’s always best to check things out for yourself before believing everything you see.
So, what do you think? Did Kim Kardashian know the furniture wasn’t real? Will she win the lawsuit? Let us know your thoughts in the comments!
Marvel Star Scarlett Johansson Takes Legal Action Against AI App for Using Her Image and Voice Without Permission
Scarlett Johansson is taking legal action against a company that used her image and voice in a commercial without her permission. The ad, which was posted on Twitter by the image-generating app Lisa AI: 90s Yearbook & Avatar, features an AI-generated version of Johansson on the set of her movie “Black Widow.”
In the ad, the AI Johansson says, “What’s up, guys? It’s Scarlett and I want you to come with me.” The ad then cuts to a shot of the Lisa AI app, with the text “Images produced by Lisa AI. It has nothing to do with this person.”
Johansson’s attorney, Kevin Yorn, told Variety that they are taking the matter “very seriously.”
“We do not take these things lightly,” Yorn said. “Per our usual course of action in these circumstances, we will deal with it with all legal remedies that we will have.”
Scarlett Johansson. Photo GOTHAM/FILMMAGIC Johansson’s lawsuit comes at a time when AI-generated content is becoming increasingly sophisticated and realistic. This raises concerns about the potential for AI to be used to create deepfakes, which are videos or audio recordings that have been manipulated to make it look or sound like someone is saying or doing something they never actually said or did.
Deepfakes have been used for a variety of purposes, including to create fake news stories, impersonate celebrities, and commit fraud. They have also been used to create non-consensual pornography, which can be particularly damaging to the victims.
Johansson’s lawsuit is an important step in raising awareness of the potential dangers of AI-generated content and the need for stronger laws to protect people from having their image and voice used without their permission.
The Legal Implications of Johansson’s Lawsuit
Johansson’s lawsuit is likely to have a significant impact on the way that AI-generated content is regulated. If she is successful, it could set a precedent for other celebrities and public figures to take legal action against companies that use their image and voice without their permission.
Johansson’s lawsuit is also likely to raise awareness of the potential dangers of deepfakes and the need for stronger laws to protect people from having their image and voice used without their permission.
The Impact on AI Companies
Johansson’s lawsuit is likely to have a negative impact on AI companies that develop and distribute AI-generated content. If she is successful, it could make it more difficult for these companies to operate and could lead to increased costs associated with compliance.
However, Johansson’s lawsuit could also lead to positive changes in the AI industry. For example, it could encourage AI companies to develop new technologies to prevent the creation and distribution of deepfakes.
Conclusion
Johansson’s lawsuit is an important step in raising awareness of the potential dangers of AI-generated content and the need for stronger laws to protect people from having their image and voice used without their permission. It is also likely to have a significant impact on the way that AI-generated content is regulated and the way that AI companies operate.
In addition to the above, here are some other thoughts on the implications of Johansson’s lawsuit:
- Johansson’s lawsuit could help to clarify the legal rights of celebrities and public figures when it comes to the use of their image and voice in AI-generated content.
- The lawsuit could also lead to the development of new technical standards and best practices for the responsible use of AI-generated content.
- Johansson’s lawsuit is a reminder that as AI technology continues to develop, it is important to have safeguards in place to protect people from potential harms.
It will be interesting to see how Johansson’s lawsuit unfolds and how it impacts the AI industry and the way we think about AI-generated content.